[m-rev.] for opinion: list formatting for diagnostics

[Zoltan Somogyi]

On 2024-06-01 15:19 +10:00 AEST, "Julien Fischer" <jfischer at opturion.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 1 Jun 2024 at 08:42, Zoltan Somogyi <zoltan.somogyi at runbox.com> wrote:
>>
>> I intend to replace all but one of the existing functions
>> for formatting lists of items to format pieces with the
>> functions listed in the attached file. I don't anticipate
>> any objections to the concept, since all it does is
>> impose order on a list of functions that currently
>> don't really fit into a pattern, but if anyone knows a better
>> naming scheme, I am all ears.
> 
> One review comment in the attached file; the overall scheme looks fine.

Thanks for that. I modified the scheme very slightly (by deleting unneeded args)
while implementing it. The diff is attached. Since the diff is mostly boring and the
concept has been reviewed, I don't think it needs review.

Zoltan.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Log.l2p
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 2607 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mercurylang.org/archives/reviews/attachments/20240601/8265ada9/attachment-0002.obj>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: DIFF.l2p
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 130744 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mercurylang.org/archives/reviews/attachments/20240601/8265ada9/attachment-0003.obj>