[m-rev.] for review: options to control the use of color
Zoltan Somogyi
zoltan.somogyi at runbox.com
Fri Apr 26 19:39:36 AEST 2024
On 2024-04-26 19:28 +10:00 AEST, "Julien Fischer" <jfischer at opturion.com> wrote:
>> +convert_color_spec_option(OptionName, OptionValue) = MaybeColorSpec :-
>> + % If/when we want to support 24-bit color, or indeed any form of
>> + % color specification beyond 8-bit, we would do it here.
>> + % (The options that specify colors are strings, not integers,
>> + % specifically to make it possible to specify 24-bit colors
>> + % as strings of the form "R-G-B".)
>
> It would probably be worth allowing the basic ANSI terminal colors to be
> specified by their usual names (e.g. black, red, green, yellow, blue etc)
> as well.
That is a good idea, but we would need different names for e.g. colors 1 and 9.
One could be "red", and the other maybe "intense red" if "red" is color 1,
and some better name for "non-intense red" if "red" is color 9. Also, while
color 11 does look like intense yellow to me, its non-intense version, colour 3,
does *not* look like yellow to me.
> The diff looks fine.
Thanks.
Zoltan.
More information about the reviews
mailing list