[m-rev.] for review: new machinery in make.dependencies.m
Zoltan Somogyi
zoltan.somogyi at runbox.com
Sat Sep 30 02:57:39 AEST 2023
For review by anyone. I am particularly seeking feedback
on whether you guys think the few test cases for which the
old/new comparison in the diff detected changes are
indicative of a problem with this diff, or not. (I have looked
at it and couldn't decide, maybe you have some ideas
I have overlooked. The failure reports for two of the
test cases are attached; the others are similar.)
I am also depending on you guys to test out this diff
on real code, since you work with code bases using mmc --make,
which I don't do. I would also like to know whether you want to
do such tryouts before this diff is committed, or after.
Zoltan.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Log.newmach
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 2722 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mercurylang.org/archives/reviews/attachments/20230930/2039b970/attachment-0004.obj>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: DIFF.newmach
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 56829 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mercurylang.org/archives/reviews/attachments/20230930/2039b970/attachment-0005.obj>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: VALID_MAKE_INT_BUG_506
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 135296 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mercurylang.org/archives/reviews/attachments/20230930/2039b970/attachment-0006.obj>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: WARNINGS_FORMAT_CALL_MULTI
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 262940 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mercurylang.org/archives/reviews/attachments/20230930/2039b970/attachment-0007.obj>
More information about the reviews
mailing list