[m-rev.] for review: reversing operator priorities
Zoltan Somogyi
zoltan.somogyi at runbox.com
Sun Nov 6 21:33:56 AEDT 2022
This implements what we discussed recently.
The diff contains several "XXX OPS" markers noting further
opportunities for improvement; I would like your feedback on these.
I would like to resolve the ones in ops.m before commit; but intend
to leave the others for a later commit.
We probably should keep the old form of the ops module around,
possibly named old_ops.m or prolog_ops.m, for anyone who
wants it. I will make the necessary changes, including to NEWS,
once we get to a concensus on this.
For review by anyone.
Zoltan.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Log.oprev
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 1966 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mercurylang.org/archives/reviews/attachments/20221106/030cd6e3/attachment-0002.obj>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: DIFF.oprev
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 58348 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mercurylang.org/archives/reviews/attachments/20221106/030cd6e3/attachment-0003.obj>
More information about the reviews
mailing list