[m-rev.] for post-commit review: gap_foldl, last_gap_foldl, and chunk_foldl[1-4]

Zoltan Somogyi zoltan.somogyi at runbox.com
Tue Mar 15 12:17:54 AEDT 2022


The concepts have been agreed before and the implementations
are straightforward, so what remains to be reviewed are the
predicate names, their descriptive comments, and for the chunk_fold
predicates, the selection of modes. I provided modes in which
- all accumulators are in,out
- the last accumulator is di,uo, and
- the last two accumulators are di,uo.
In my experience, these are enough.

Zoltan.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Log.fold
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 296 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mercurylang.org/archives/reviews/attachments/20220315/2d20a359/attachment.obj>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: DIFF.fold
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 13946 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mercurylang.org/archives/reviews/attachments/20220315/2d20a359/attachment-0001.obj>


More information about the reviews mailing list