[m-rev.] for post-commit review: fix some debug grade test failures
Zoltan Somogyi
zoltan.somogyi at runbox.com
Tue Jun 28 15:03:47 AEST 2022
2022-06-27 12:11 GMT+10:00 "Peter Wang" <novalazy at gmail.com>:
> Ok. This seems rather inefficient whenever 'trusted' is called for a
> procedure that lives in a sub-module. Any idea if it makes a big
> difference?
It can, which is why the attached diff fixes both this ...
> It should be better to add each standard library module to
> the trust database upfront (obviously). On the other hand, the code
> doesn't look very optimised anyway.
... and the old wasteful approach. For your review.
Zoltan.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Log.trust
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 1405 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mercurylang.org/archives/reviews/attachments/20220628/500c880f/attachment-0002.obj>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: DIFF.trust
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 28943 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mercurylang.org/archives/reviews/attachments/20220628/500c880f/attachment-0003.obj>
More information about the reviews
mailing list