[m-rev.] for post-commit review: organize array.m, bt_array.m and pprint.m

Zoltan Somogyi zoltan.somogyi at runbox.com
Wed Jun 8 19:58:43 AEST 2022


The diff mostly just moves code around, so it is not worth reviewing.
The parts worth looking at are

- the groups into which the exported predicates been moved, and
- the comments on those exported predicates.

This diff also raises a question: should we make the informal
"submodule" for random-access lists in bt_array.m an actual
documented module of the standard library, and if so, under
what name? I vote yes, but am agnostic about the name.
random_access_list would be more descriptive, but ra_list
is shorter.

Zoltan.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Log.jun8
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 654 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mercurylang.org/archives/reviews/attachments/20220608/b94b291d/attachment-0002.obj>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: DIFF.jun8
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 123099 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mercurylang.org/archives/reviews/attachments/20220608/b94b291d/attachment-0003.obj>


More information about the reviews mailing list