[m-rev.] for post-commit review: convert more passes to use var_tables

Zoltan Somogyi zoltan.somogyi at runbox.com
Sat Apr 30 05:06:05 AEST 2022


Most of this is boring and does not need review, but I would like
Peter to take a look at the new XXXs in tupling.m, in candidate_headvars_of_proc_2.
Was the test that excluded unnamed variables from being put into tuples
intentional, and if so, what was the reasoning behind it?

Zoltan.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Log.vt10
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 1743 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mercurylang.org/archives/reviews/attachments/20220430/62d3d581/attachment-0002.obj>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: DIFF.vt10
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 136162 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mercurylang.org/archives/reviews/attachments/20220430/62d3d581/attachment-0003.obj>


More information about the reviews mailing list