[m-rev.] for review: checked defns in parse_tree_module_src
Zoltan Somogyi
zoltan.somogyi at runbox.com
Sat Oct 16 17:01:33 AEDT 2021
2021-10-16 16:50 GMT+11:00 "Julien Fischer" <jfischer at opturion.com>:
>> Since the section mismatch between the two declarations
>> was the only error in the test case, making it not an error
>> makes the test case fail by having the compiler exit
>> with a success exit code.
>>
>> I could make the compiler generate an error for this case,
>> but I don't think that would be a good idea, since that would
>> complicate the relatively simple rule "redundant declarations
>> get at most a warning". This would require moving the test case
>> to tests/warnings. Does anyone object to this move?
>
> No.
Ok, I will move the test case.
>> > compiler/add_type.m:
>> Comment out an error message for a condition that will be detected and
>> reported by check_type_inst_mode_defns.m.
>
> Is there a reason you are not removing it?
It does not matter: I am about to replace much of add_type.m,
including that code.
I followed your other suggestions.
> That looks fine otherwise.
Thanks for the review.
Zoltan.
More information about the reviews
mailing list