[m-rev.] for review: simplify subtype checking code
Peter Wang
novalazy at gmail.com
Mon Jul 12 10:54:58 AEST 2021
On Fri, 09 Jul 2021 13:35:01 +1000 "Zoltan Somogyi" <zoltan.somogyi at runbox.com> wrote:
> For review by Peter. The ATn files are intermediate versions,
> and may, or may not, be useful in the review.
>
> Zoltan.
> Simplify the code checking subtypes.
>
> compiler/add_type.m:
> Make the code that looks up supertypes also check whether they are
> du types without a foreign definition, since all its uses need that check.
>
> Add each supertype to the "list of previous supertypes" when it actually
> becomes "previous".
>
> Factor out code that was repeated in (a) checking the immediate supertype,
> and (b) checking more distant ancestor supertypes.
>
> Put the code that constructs error_specs next to the code that constructs
> their main components, the pieces.
>
> The above changes make it possible to replace check_subtype_defn,
> check_subtype_defn_2 and check_subtype_defn_3 into one predicate.
>
> Inline some other predicates/functions into their only call sites as well.
>
> Give some predicates and variable more meaningful names.
That's fine.
Peter
More information about the reviews
mailing list