[m-rev.] for review: help diagnose non-fully-qualified references to use_module'd modules

Zoltan Somogyi zoltan.somogyi at runbox.com
Mon Apr 26 23:05:50 AEST 2021



On Mon, 26 Apr 2021 16:20:43 +1000 (AEST), Julien Fischer <jfischer at opturion.com> wrote:
> > +% ZZZ a.b.c
> > +% qualified(qualified(unqualified(a), b), c)
> 
> What's that comment in aid of?

Just something to help me write the code just above.
I should have deleted it before sending the diff.
 
> I think the error messages could be further improved by having a verbose component
> along the lines of:
> 
>      These modules are imported by a `:- use_module' declaration; symbols
>      from such modules *must* be fully qualified.

Will do.

> The diff is fine otherwise.

Thank you.

Zoltan.





More information about the reviews mailing list