[m-rev.] for review: set up five streams for compiler output
jfischer at opturion.com
Thu Nov 19 23:07:53 AEDT 2020
On Thu, 19 Nov 2020, Zoltan Somogyi wrote:
> 2020-11-19 22:04 GMT+11:00 "Julien Fischer" <jfischer at opturion.com>:
>> Seems fine to me.
> Thank you.
>>> + "--error-output-suffix .xyz",
>>> + "\tWhen compiling module M, output any error, warning and/or",
>>> + "\tinformational messages about the module to a file named `M.xyz'.",
>>> + "\tThe default is for such output to go to standard error.",
>> I would write that as:
>> --error-output-suffix <suffix>
>> When compiling module M, output messages about the progress
>> of the compilation to a file named `M.<suffix>`. This includes any
>> statistics about the performance of compiler passes, if enabled.
>> The default is for such output to go to standard error.
> Is that description for --progress-output-suffix? I intended --error-output-suffix
> to be for error_specs (of all severities), not progress messages.
I may have cut-and-pasted the wrong bits; I was objecting to the
wording, just the <suffix> bit.
More information about the reviews