[m-rev.] for review: Avoid require_tailrec_N failures at higher optimisation levels.

[Julien Fischer]

On Wed, 11 Nov 2020, Peter Wang wrote:

> tests/invalid/require_tailrec_1.m:
> tests/invalid/require_tailrec_2.m:
> tests/invalid/require_tailrec_3.m:
>    Suppress some inlining that occurs at higher optimisation levels,
>    that changes the warnings produced for require_tail_recursion
>    pragmas.
>
> tests/invalid/require_tailrec_1.err_exp:
> tests/invalid/require_tailrec_1.err_exp2:
> tests/invalid/require_tailrec_1.err_exp3:
> tests/invalid/require_tailrec_2.err_exp:
> tests/invalid/require_tailrec_2.err_exp2:
> tests/invalid/require_tailrec_2.err_exp3:
>    Update expected outputs for changed line numbers.

That's fine -- thanks for looking into that.

Julien.