[m-rev.] for review: require module a.b to be a.b.m without mmc -f

[Zoltan Somogyi]

For review, and maybe a tryout, by Julien or Peter.

There should also be an announcement, such as:

The compiler now requires that, in projects that do not build
a Mercury.modules file using e.g. "mmc -f *.m", submodules must be stored
in files whose name is the fully qualified module name followed by ".m".
This means that e.g. a module named a.b.c must be in a file named
a.b.c.m.

However, I don't know where to put this during the release process.

Zoltan.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Log.sub
Type: text/x-microdvd
Size: 1014 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mercurylang.org/archives/reviews/attachments/20200112/fc817067/attachment.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: DIFF.sub
Type: text/x-microdvd
Size: 12805 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mercurylang.org/archives/reviews/attachments/20200112/fc817067/attachment-0001.bin>