[m-rev.] for review: decide type representations via checked type definitions

[Zoltan Somogyi]

On Sat, 26 Oct 2019 17:36:19 +1100 (AEDT), Julien Fischer <jfischer at opturion.com> wrote:
> >     Do not explicitly record the number of function symbols in direct_dummy
> >     % and enum types, and the number bits needed to represent values of
> 
> Delete "%".

Thanks for the review. I followed all your suggestions, but hadn't yet written out
the vim buffer with this deletion when I used the log file for the commit, so this
stayed in :-(

Zoltan.