[m-rev.] for review: changes to mmake and bootcheck

Zoltan Somogyi zoltan.somogyi at runbox.com
Tue Jun 25 06:53:09 AEST 2019



On Tue, 18 Jun 2019 12:40:20 +0200 (CEST), "Zoltan Somogyi" <zoltan.somogyi at runbox.com> wrote:
> For bootcheck, my question is not really about the diff, but whether we should
> build the slice, profiler, deep_profiler and mfilterjavac directories in stage 3?
> At the moment, we do not, so we do not compare them to stage 2. I think
> we (I) should fix this. Any objections?

The attached diff extends bootcheck along the lines mentioned above.
Would anyone like to review it?

Zoltan.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Log.s23
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 1048 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mercurylang.org/archives/reviews/attachments/20190624/c7dca937/attachment.obj>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: DIFF.s23
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 16736 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mercurylang.org/archives/reviews/attachments/20190624/c7dca937/attachment-0001.obj>


More information about the reviews mailing list