[m-rev.] for review: insts in mode error messages

[Zoltan Somogyi]

On Fri, 27 Nov 2015 10:42:53 +1100 (AEDT), Julien Fischer <jfischer at opturion.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Nov 2015, Zoltan Somogyi wrote:
> 
> > For review by anyone.
> >
> > I would like the review to answer a question: should the
> > predicates that convert insts to format components be
> > put into a new module or not? There is another place
> > in the compiler that could use them; the code that
> > reports invalid insts in mutable declarations.
> 
> You haven't attached the diff.
> 
> Julien.

Thanks for catching that.

Actually, I did attach them, but forgot to fill in the "To" line.
I got the obvious error for that, fixed it, and sent the email,
not noticing that the error stripped the attachments.

Runbox still knows they *were* attached to something,
because it generates these stupid "1-" prefixes on the first
duplicates. I told them about this problem two years ago,
and they said they'd look into fixing it, but obviously,
they haven't.

Zoltan.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 1-Log.mode_errors
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 2790 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mercurylang.org/archives/reviews/attachments/20151127/497139bb/attachment.obj>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 1-DIFF.mode_errors
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 95344 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mercurylang.org/archives/reviews/attachments/20151127/497139bb/attachment-0001.obj>