[m-rev.] Handling pull requests
Peter Wang
novalazy at gmail.com
Mon Jan 7 12:09:13 AEDT 2013
On Mon, 7 Jan 2013 11:39:12 +1100, Julien Fischer <jfischer at opturion.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Paul Bone <paul at bone.id.au> wrote:
>
> > I think the bit that needs discussion is how we do code reviews now that
> > we're using git and github. What I'd like to acheive here is a way that any
> > of us can do code reviews, with any tools we like (eg vim and diff/patch or
> > github or git & vim). And that the process should be simple regardless of
> > which tools we want to use. Eg: I do not want to "force" github usage onto
> > anyone.
>
> The existing process, i.e. send the log message + patch to the mailing list,
> is fine IMO.
Agreed. That pull request emails don't contain the diff is a huge step
backwards. Email + vim is better than any web interface.
Non-core developers may prefer to send pull requests, but their changes
won't likely be very big anyway so not much to review.
Peter
More information about the reviews
mailing list