[m-rev.] Converting to Git.

[Julien Fischer]

On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 11:22 AM, Paul Bone <paul at bone.id.au> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 11:11:43AM +1100, Peter Ross wrote:
>> On 2 January 2013 10:25, Paul Bone <paul at bone.id.au> wrote:
>> >
>> > That would create a history with new hash IDs, and therefore will break any
>> > checkouts that others have made.  I know a few people who have already
>> > cloned the repository, despite us not saying it's ready, so I'd rather not
>> > do this.
>> >
>> > How do others feel about using the current (good enough) conversion?
>> > Or fixing up the issues identified by Peter?
>> >
>> It's good enough for me, but if someone wants to rewrite the history
>> to use correct emails and so on, that is fine with me.
>>
>> I don't think asking people to reclone is a big issue, as no-one said
>> the repo was ready for use yet.
>
> That's part of it.
>
> The other bit is that If we call it 'ready' now then we can move on and get
> some real work done :-).

I've just gone through and clean up the dead files that were resurrected.
(I may have missed some.)  In light of this, the git repository is now
the "real"
one.

Cheers,
Julien.