[m-rev.] for review [www]: Try to clarify licensing.

Peter Wang novalazy at gmail.com
Thu Apr 18 17:22:30 AEST 2013

On Thu, 18 Apr 2013 16:39:11 +1000, Paul Bone <paul at bone.id.au> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 02:43:09PM +1000, Peter Wang wrote:
> I suggest using three paragraphs.  I've added breaks.

I agree with your suggestions, but the text comes verbatim from the
README.  What's good for the web site ought to be good for the README, yes?

Also, as someone mentioned, the existing README should be renamed
LICEN[CS]E or something, and a new README written.  Actually, the
non-release specific stuff in RELEASE_NOTES would serve okay.


More information about the reviews mailing list