[m-rev.] for review: unboxed float ctor args in LLDS grades on 32-bit
Peter Wang
novalazy at gmail.com
Fri Sep 16 18:53:01 AEST 2011
On 2011-09-15, Julien Fischer <juliensf at csse.unimelb.edu.au> wrote:
>
> Hi Peter,
>
> On Tue, 30 Aug 2011, Peter Wang wrote:
>
> >Branches: main
> >
> >Make it possible to store double-precision `float' constructor arguments in
> >unboxed form, in low-level C grades on 32-bit platforms, i.e. `float' (and
> >equivalent) arguments may occupy two machine words. However, until we implement
> >float registers, this does more harm than good so it remains disabled.
>
> That looks fine (I haven't looked closely at the float registers change
> yet though.)
Thanks, committed.
Peter
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
mercury-reviews mailing list
Post messages to: mercury-reviews at csse.unimelb.edu.au
Administrative Queries: owner-mercury-reviews at csse.unimelb.edu.au
Subscriptions: mercury-reviews-request at csse.unimelb.edu.au
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the reviews
mailing list