[m-rev.] for review: enumeration argument packing
Julien Fischer
juliensf at csse.unimelb.edu.au
Mon Jul 4 16:26:40 AEST 2011
On Mon, 4 Jul 2011, Julien Fischer wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Jul 2011, Peter Wang wrote:
>
>> On 2011-07-01, Julien Fischer <juliensf at csse.unimelb.edu.au> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Peter,
>>>
>>> On Mon, 27 Jun 2011, Peter Wang wrote:
>>>
>>>> Branches: main
>>>>
>>>> Pack consecutive enumeration arguments in discriminated union types into
>>>> a
>>>> single word to reduce cell sizes. Argument packing is only enabled on C
>>>> back-ends, and reordering arguments to improve opportunities for packing
>>>> is
>>>> not yet attempted. The RTTI implementations for other back-ends will
>>>> need to
>>>> be updated, but that is best left until after any argument reordering
>>>> change.
>>>>
>>>> Modules which import abstract enumeration types are notified so by
>>>> writing
>>>> declarations of the form:
>>>>
>>>> :- type foo where type_is_abstract_enum(NumBits).
>>>>
>>>> into the interface file for the module which defines the type.
>>>
>>> I have a couple of questions regarding this:
>>>
>>> * Is this option safe in the presence (possibly, by disabling it) of
>>> --cross-compiling?
>>
>> I don't know what effect --cross-compiling should have, if any.
>
> --cross-compiling disables all optimizations that rely on features of
> a specific machine, e.g. the word size of that machine.
>
>> The packing uses the --bits-per-word option to know how many arguments
>> can be packed together.
>
> In which case, --cross-compiling should imply --no-allow-argument
> packing.
Now I come to think about it, I'm wrong about that. When building the
source distribution we force bits-per-word to be 32, so it should
be ok.
Julien.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
mercury-reviews mailing list
Post messages to: mercury-reviews at csse.unimelb.edu.au
Administrative Queries: owner-mercury-reviews at csse.unimelb.edu.au
Subscriptions: mercury-reviews-request at csse.unimelb.edu.au
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the reviews
mailing list