[m-rev.] for review: add missing trail segments documentation

[Julien Fischer]

On Tue, 23 Mar 2010, Paul Bone wrote:

> On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 11:54:05PM +1100, Julien Fischer wrote:
> >
> > Branches: main, 10.04
> >
> > Add missing trail segments documentation.
> >
> > doc/user_guide.texi:
> > 	Document the .trseg grade component and --trail-segments option.
> >
>
> Should trseg be recommeded above tr in the documentation?  That is, I would
> advise anyone who needs a trail to use trseg rather than tr.

The trade-offs between the two approaches are already explained and
.trseg is the default.  I wouldn't necessarily advise what you suggest.

Julien.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
mercury-reviews mailing list
Post messages to:       mercury-reviews at csse.unimelb.edu.au
Administrative Queries: owner-mercury-reviews at csse.unimelb.edu.au
Subscriptions:          mercury-reviews-request at csse.unimelb.edu.au
--------------------------------------------------------------------------