[m-rev.] for review: improve hash tables

Paul Bone pbone at csse.unimelb.edu.au
Mon Jul 19 22:39:44 AEST 2010


On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 03:31:45PM +1000, Julien Fischer wrote:
>
> On Mon, 19 Jul 2010, Peter Wang wrote:
>
>> [This should be safe for 10.04 as well]
>
> Ok, although it's now part of 10.04.1.
>

Why bother with a 10.04.1,  Anyone who really wants access to new features at
the risk of those features introducing bugs can use the ROTDs.  If they want
the new features without the risk of bugs then they can wait 6 months.  We
should only bother with 10.04.1 if we have some serious bugfixes to distribute.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 489 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.mercurylang.org/archives/reviews/attachments/20100719/623a6914/attachment.sig>


More information about the reviews mailing list