[m-rev.] for review: deconstruct.named_arg for java

[Julien Fischer]

On Wed, 14 Jul 2010, Ian MacLarty wrote:

> On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 3:15 PM, Zoltan Somogyi <zs at csse.unimelb.edu.au> wrote:
>> On 14-Jul-2010, Ian MacLarty <maclarty at csse.unimelb.edu.au> wrote:
>>> That doesn't appear to solve the problem.  The function is actually
>>> used.  What is needed is a "defined" attribute to convince gcc that
>>> the function is actually defined.
>>
>> Since the state of things as they were before all this started actually
>> worked, I think gcc was sufficiently convinced already.
>>
>
> I'm not sure what you mean.  As far as I know gcc 4.x has always
> emitted these warnings for the code generated in asm_fast.gc.

It has certainly always emitted them from gcc 4.1 onwards.  (4.0 was too
broken on most platforms for us to either notice or care.)

Julien.