[m-rev.] for review: deconstruct.named_arg for java

[Zoltan Somogyi]

On 14-Jul-2010, Ian MacLarty <maclarty at csse.unimelb.edu.au> wrote:
> That doesn't appear to solve the problem.  The function is actually
> used.  What is needed is a "defined" attribute to convince gcc that
> the function is actually defined.

Since the state of things as they were before all this started actually
worked, I think gcc was sufficiently convinced already.

> I changed the definition of the macro that emits the function
> declaration to the following to test your suggestion:
> 
> static void label(void) __asm__("_entry_" MR_STRINGIFY(label))
> __attribute__((unused))

And what is the result? Do you get the right code generated, and do you get
the warnings?

Zoltan.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
mercury-reviews mailing list
Post messages to:       mercury-reviews at csse.unimelb.edu.au
Administrative Queries: owner-mercury-reviews at csse.unimelb.edu.au
Subscriptions:          mercury-reviews-request at csse.unimelb.edu.au
--------------------------------------------------------------------------