[m-rev.] for review / comment: simplify code in solutions.m
Paul Bone
pbone at csse.unimelb.edu.au
Wed Dec 1 08:46:53 AEDT 2010
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 10:59:36PM +1100, Julien Fischer wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I would like opinions as to whether the following diff constitutes an
> acceptable abuse of the promise_equivalent_solutions mechanism.
> (A similar change could be made to get_one_solution etc, in builtin.m
> which would then remove the need for a bunch of foreign_procs.)
Both alternatives (before and after the diff) 'mean' the same thing, that is
that you only care about one (the first) solution.
I'm okay with this change.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.mercurylang.org/archives/reviews/attachments/20101201/c6f2751b/attachment.sig>
More information about the reviews
mailing list