[m-rev.] Re: [m-dev.] Deep Profiler: clique_proc_report and clique_proc_report_dynamic
Zoltan Somogyi
zs at csse.unimelb.edu.au
Wed Feb 11 11:35:41 AEDT 2009
On 10-Feb-2009, Paul Bone <pbone at csse.unimelb.edu.au> wrote:
> :- type clique_proc_report
> ---> clique_proc_report(
> % Summary information for the cost of this procedure in this
> % clique.
> cpr_proc_summary :: perf_row_data(proc_desc),
>
> % Multiple proc dynamics may occur within the same clique when
> % there are recursive calls to the same procedure that are
> % called from different contexts (created by mutually-recursive
> % calls). This is quite rare. This can occur when the calls
> % have different call sites or when they are called called from
> % different contexts within the same clique.
> cpr_first_proc_dynamic :: clique_proc_dynamic_report,
> cpr_other_proc_dynamics :: list(clique_proc_dynamic_report)
> ).
>
I don't think that is informative. I have instead committed this diff.
cvs diff: Diffing .
Index: report.m
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/mercury/mercury1/repository/mercury/deep_profiler/report.m,v
retrieving revision 1.17
diff -u -b -r1.17 report.m
--- report.m 2 Jan 2009 02:59:36 -0000 1.17
+++ report.m 11 Feb 2009 00:34:09 -0000
@@ -137,6 +137,29 @@
% clique.
cpr_proc_summary :: perf_row_data(proc_desc),
+ % A clique may contain more than one proc_dynamic for the same
+ % procedure in one rare circumstance. Consider a clique of
+ % two procedures, let's call them p and q. The entry procedure
+ % is p. When p calls q and q then calls p, the runtime
+ % discovers they are in the same clique. However, after all
+ % those mutually recursive calls unwind and we get back to the
+ % original call to p, p can call q again. If it does so through
+ % a call site through which it has not called q before, then
+ % the call port code in q will allocate a new proc_dynamic,
+ % since it will not find an existing one it can reuse;
+ % q's proc_static won't point to an active proc_dynamic, and
+ % the call site will not supply one either.
+ %
+ % We could modify the code we invoke at call ports to keep a
+ % list of the proc_dynamics of the procedures known to be in
+ % the current clique, and to reuse the proc_dynamic of the
+ % callee in these cases, but that would significantly increase
+ % the call port overhead. Instead, we let the callee allocate a
+ % second (and maybe third etc) proc_dynamic for a procedure,
+ % and let the deep profiler sort it out.
+ %
+ % Note that the entry procedure of a clique will always have
+ % exactly one proc_dynamic.
cpr_first_proc_dynamic :: clique_proc_dynamic_report,
cpr_other_proc_dynamics :: list(clique_proc_dynamic_report)
).
cvs diff: Diffing notes
Zoltan.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
mercury-developers mailing list
Post messages to: mercury-developers at csse.unimelb.edu.au
Administrative Queries: owner-mercury-developers at csse.unimelb.edu.au
Subscriptions: mercury-developers-request at csse.unimelb.edu.au
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
mercury-reviews mailing list
Post messages to: mercury-reviews at csse.unimelb.edu.au
Administrative Queries: owner-mercury-reviews at csse.unimelb.edu.au
Subscriptions: mercury-reviews-request at csse.unimelb.edu.au
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the reviews
mailing list