[m-rev.] for review: improvements to net/tcp.m
Peter Wang
wangp at students.csse.unimelb.edu.au
Thu Mar 29 12:34:44 AEST 2007
On 28/03/07, Ian MacLarty <maclarty at csse.unimelb.edu.au> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 05:05:39PM +1000, Julien Fischer wrote:
> >
> > Actually you should probably define:
> >
> > :- type line ---> line(string).
> >
> > and use that in instance instead of just a raw string. We were
> > planning to add something like the above to the io module anyway,
> > so it may be a good time work out the details.
> >
>
> What about giving a block size when you initialize the tcp socket
> and then having stream.get/4 return strings of this length?
>
> Breaking the data up on lines seems a bit arbitrary to me. It's
> possible that there are no line breaks in the data, which means it will
> all be read into one big string, which could be a performance problem.
And a DOS vulnerability. However lines are very common units and it's
worth providing a correct and efficient implementation. We could
allow the user to specify a maximum expected line length.
Peter
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
mercury-reviews mailing list
Post messages to: mercury-reviews at csse.unimelb.edu.au
Administrative Queries: owner-mercury-reviews at csse.unimelb.edu.au
Subscriptions: mercury-reviews-request at csse.unimelb.edu.au
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the reviews
mailing list