[m-rev.] For revew: a new, improved pretty printer

[Zoltan Somogyi]

On 02-Aug-2007, Ian MacLarty <maclarty at csse.unimelb.edu.au> wrote:
> Out of curiosity, what's the reason for putting the comment after the
> functor and not before?  In all other situations we put the comment
> *before* the thing the comment is about.

A type definition looks like this:

:- type t
	--->	f1(...)
	;	f2(...)

Putting the comment on the line before the function symbol just looks weird to
me, as well as being easily confusable with the comment that should be before
the line with ":- type", which should describe the whole type, not just f1.

Zoltan.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
mercury-reviews mailing list
Post messages to:       mercury-reviews at csse.unimelb.edu.au
Administrative Queries: owner-mercury-reviews at csse.unimelb.edu.au
Subscriptions:          mercury-reviews-request at csse.unimelb.edu.au
--------------------------------------------------------------------------