[m-rev.] for review: doc/Makefile
Julien Fischer
juliensf at csse.unimelb.edu.au
Mon Oct 16 15:17:31 AEST 2006
On Mon, 16 Oct 2006, Zoltan Somogyi wrote:
> For review by Julien.
>
> Zoltan.
>
> doc/Mmakefile:
> Fix an annoyance: if TEXI2DVI is autoconfigured to a command (such
> as pdflatex) that generates PDFs instead of dvi files, then every make
> in the doc directory remakes a bunch of files, even if they are already
> up to date, because make thinks the dvi files are missing. This diff
> makes the Mmakefile care only about whether TEXI2DVI was run, not
> whether it generates .dvi files.
>
The diff is fine but why (and how) is TEXI2DVI autoconfigured to pdflatex?
Is texi2dvi a symbolic link for pdflatex on the system where this is
happening?
Julien.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
mercury-reviews mailing list
Post messages to: mercury-reviews at csse.unimelb.edu.au
Administrative Queries: owner-mercury-reviews at csse.unimelb.edu.au
Subscriptions: mercury-reviews-request at csse.unimelb.edu.au
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the reviews
mailing list