[m-rev.] diff: --smart-recompilation and sub-modules bug

Julien Fischer juliensf at cs.mu.OZ.AU
Wed Mar 22 17:51:51 AEDT 2006


On Wed, 22 Mar 2006, Peter Ross wrote:

> On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 04:08:01PM +1100, Zoltan Somogyi wrote:
> > On 22-Mar-2006, Peter Ross <pro at missioncriticalit.com> wrote:
> > >  insert_into_imported_items_map(VisibleModule, !ImportedItemsMap) :-
> > >      ModuleItems = init_item_id_set(set.init),
> > > -    svmap.det_insert(VisibleModule, ModuleItems, !ImportedItemsMap).
> > > +    svmap.set(VisibleModule, ModuleItems, !ImportedItemsMap).
> >
> > I think there should be a comment on the call to set here to say why
> > we call set instead of det_insert.
> >
> Adding
>
>         %
>         % Use set rather than det_insert as this routine maybe
>         % called multiple times with the same VisibleModule
>         % depending on why the module is visible.
>         % eg it's both imported and an ancestor module
>         %
>
> Also there is no test case because test/hard_coded/submodules/deeply_nested
> tickles this bug as well.

I think I'll add the other test case anyway since otherwise this bug won't
be tickled on any of our machines that test with `--intermod-opt', which
is pretty much all of them.

Julien.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
mercury-reviews mailing list
post:  mercury-reviews at cs.mu.oz.au
administrative address: owner-mercury-reviews at cs.mu.oz.au
unsubscribe: Address: mercury-reviews-request at cs.mu.oz.au Message: unsubscribe
subscribe:   Address: mercury-reviews-request at cs.mu.oz.au Message: subscribe
--------------------------------------------------------------------------



More information about the reviews mailing list