[m-rev.] for review: fix asm_fast.par.gc
Julien Fischer
juliensf at cs.mu.OZ.AU
Tue Mar 7 19:05:39 AEDT 2006
On Tue, 7 Mar 2006, Peter Wang wrote:
> On 2006-03-07, Julien Fischer <juliensf at cs.mu.OZ.AU> wrote:
> > > > Otherwise that's
> > > > fine. Does this change fix any of the problems with the lowlevel .par
> > > > grades?
> > >
> > > Yes, that was the intention :-) Parallel conjunctions in the lowlevel
> > > .par grades can execute in separate threads if you set the
> > > MERCURY_OPTIONS variable with "-Pn", where n is the number of threads to
> > > spawn initially.
> > >
> >
> > So the next question is: how much of the test suite passes? (Last time
> > I checked, which was sometime before the 0.12 release, there were quite
> > a few problems.)
>
> Here's the list of failing tests on saturn. I think most of are failing
> for other reasons (64-bitness, plus the copy of the testsuite used is a
> bit more recent than the rest of my workspace).
>
> debugger/declarative/nodescend_tracking
> hard_coded/integer_test
> invalid/duplicate_instance_2
>
I'm not sure why those three are failing (although at a guess the last
one may have something to do with Mark's change to the parser) - not
sure about the other two though.
Julien.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
mercury-reviews mailing list
post: mercury-reviews at cs.mu.oz.au
administrative address: owner-mercury-reviews at cs.mu.oz.au
unsubscribe: Address: mercury-reviews-request at cs.mu.oz.au Message: unsubscribe
subscribe: Address: mercury-reviews-request at cs.mu.oz.au Message: subscribe
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the reviews
mailing list