[m-rev.] for review: pure mutable access predicates

[Julien Fischer]

On Wed, 5 Oct 2005, Ralph Becket wrote:

> Julien Fischer, Wednesday,  5 October 2005:
> >
> > The mutable still won't necessarily be attached to the IO
> > state - we still generate the nonpure access preds.  Plus
> > I don't really like that name.
>
> I just think `pure' is the wrong name.  What the extra attribute does is
> construct an extra pair of pure access predicates that adjust the IO
> state.  It seems to me that the io state should therefore be mentioned
> in the new attribute name.  Apart from that I'm not really bothered
> about what name we pick for it.
>

Well, in the absence of any better suggestions we'll go with
`attach_to_io_state' then.

Julien.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
mercury-reviews mailing list
post:  mercury-reviews at cs.mu.oz.au
administrative address: owner-mercury-reviews at cs.mu.oz.au
unsubscribe: Address: mercury-reviews-request at cs.mu.oz.au Message: unsubscribe
subscribe:   Address: mercury-reviews-request at cs.mu.oz.au Message: subscribe
--------------------------------------------------------------------------