[m-rev.] for review: pure mutable access predicates

[Julien Fischer]

On Wed, 5 Oct 2005, Ralph Becket wrote:

> Julien Fischer, Wednesday,  5 October 2005:
> > >
> > > I would vote for something like `attach_to_io_state'...
> >
> > In place of the `pure' attribute?
>
> Yes.

The mutable still won't necessarily be attached to the IO
state - we still generate the nonpure access preds.  Plus
I don't really like that name.

Julien.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
mercury-reviews mailing list
post:  mercury-reviews at cs.mu.oz.au
administrative address: owner-mercury-reviews at cs.mu.oz.au
unsubscribe: Address: mercury-reviews-request at cs.mu.oz.au Message: unsubscribe
subscribe:   Address: mercury-reviews-request at cs.mu.oz.au Message: subscribe
--------------------------------------------------------------------------