[m-rev.] diff: more :- import_module updates, and tree.m
Zoltan Somogyi
zs at cs.mu.OZ.AU
Thu Mar 24 14:56:24 AEDT 2005
On 24-Mar-2005, Julien Fischer <juliensf at cs.mu.OZ.AU> wrote:
> > Fix a performance problem I noticed while update :- import_module
> > items. Instead of supplying a function to convert lists of trees
> > to a tree, make the tree data structure able to hold a list of
> > subtrees directly. This reduces the number of times where we have to
> > convert list of trees to trees that are sticks just to stay within
> > the old definition of what a tree is.
>
> Does this make a noticeble difference?
I don't think so. I did it mostly because I remember that updating the
nested trees is very error prone; it is too easy to accidentally delete
one of the parentheses in the forest of ))))s at the end :-(, and I wanted
to fix that without introducing a slowdown of any significant magnitude.
Zoltan.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
mercury-reviews mailing list
post: mercury-reviews at cs.mu.oz.au
administrative address: owner-mercury-reviews at cs.mu.oz.au
unsubscribe: Address: mercury-reviews-request at cs.mu.oz.au Message: unsubscribe
subscribe: Address: mercury-reviews-request at cs.mu.oz.au Message: subscribe
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the reviews
mailing list