[m-rev.] for review: add xmlable typeclass to term_to_xml module

[Zoltan Somogyi]

On 25-Jul-2005, Ian MacLarty <maclarty at cs.mu.OZ.AU> wrote:
> > I prefer either 'to_xml' or just 'xml' as names for the typeclass.
> 
> I don't mind to_xml, but xml is too vauge.  Are there any other opinions?

I prefer xmlable too.

Zoltan.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
mercury-reviews mailing list
post:  mercury-reviews at cs.mu.oz.au
administrative address: owner-mercury-reviews at cs.mu.oz.au
unsubscribe: Address: mercury-reviews-request at cs.mu.oz.au Message: unsubscribe
subscribe:   Address: mercury-reviews-request at cs.mu.oz.au Message: subscribe
--------------------------------------------------------------------------