[m-rev.] for review: add mdb `dice' command
Ian MacLarty
maclarty at cs.mu.OZ.AU
Mon Feb 7 16:10:36 AEDT 2005
On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 03:25:23PM +1100, Julien Fischer wrote:
> > > > + SpecialPredId = compare,
> > > > + Name = "__Compare__"
> > > > + ;
> > > > + SpecialPredId = initialise,
> > > > + Name = "__Initialise__"
> > > > + ),
> > > The module compiler/special_pred contains predicates for handling the
> > > names of special preds. I suggest moving the relevant bits into the
> > > mdbcomp library and using them here.
> > >
> >
> > Okay. I've moved special_pred_description/2 from
> > compiler/special_pred.m to mdbcomp/prim_data.m, made it a function, and
> > used it in dice.m
> >
>
> special_pred_description/2 is going to give you a different form
> of the name than that you originally had. I was thinking of
> special_pred_name_arity/3.
>
special_pred_name_arity/3 will also give a different name, but the
issue's not very important since compiler generated predicates aren't
included in the trace counts anyway. I've used special_pred_name_arity
instead since the names it gives are shorter.
> > > The amount of nesting and lack of whitespace here make this block of
> > > code very difficult to understand. Would it be possible to factor some
> > > of this out into separate functions?
> > >
> >
> > What do you mean by lack of whitespace? Where would you like to see
> > more whitespace?
> >
> Perhaps lack of whitespace wasn't a good way of putting it - my main point
> was that a great big lump of C code like that is fairly unreadable.
>
What about this:
for (module_num = 0; module_num < num_modules; module_num++) {
module = MR_module_infos[module_num];
/*
** Check if the label occurs in this module.
*/
if (MR_streq(Module, module->MR_ml_name)) {
num_files = module->MR_ml_filename_count;
for (file_num = 0; file_num < num_files; file_num++) {
file = module->MR_ml_module_file_layout[file_num];
num_labels = file->MR_mfl_label_count;
for (label_num = 0; label_num < num_labels; label_num++) {
label = file->MR_mfl_label_layout[label_num];
proc = label->MR_sll_entry;
id = &proc->MR_sle_user;
/*
** Check if the proc name, arity and mode are the same as
** the name, arity and mode for the label we are interested
** in.
*/
if (MR_streq(id->MR_user_name, Name) &&
id->MR_user_arity == Arity &&
id->MR_user_mode == ModeNo) {
/*
** Check if the path/port is the same as the
** label we are interested in.
*/
MR_TRACE_CALL_MERCURY(
MR_MDB_same_path_port(
(MR_String) MR_label_goal_path(label),
label->MR_sll_port, PathPort, &are_same);
);
if (are_same) {
/*
** We have found the label, so return the
** filename and line number.
*/
filename = file->MR_mfl_filename;
LineNo = file->MR_mfl_label_lineno[label_num];
SUCCESS_INDICATOR = MR_TRUE;
MR_TRACE_USE_HP(
MR_make_aligned_string(FileName,
(MR_String) filename);
);
goto end;
}
}
}
}
}
}
Note I also removed the call to MR_find_context, since it wasn't really
necessary.
> > > > + at sp 1
> > > > + at item dice [-p at var{filename}] [-f at var{filename}] [-n at var{num}] [-s[pPfFsS]+] [-o @var{filename}]
> > > > + at kindex dice (mdb command)
> > > > +Display a program dice on the screen.
> > > > + at sp 1
> > > > +A dice is a comparison between some successful test runs of the program and a
> > > > +failing test run. Before using the @samp{dice} command one or more passing
> > > > +execution summaries and one failing execution summary should be generated.
> > > > +This can be done by compiling the program with deep tracing enabled (either by
> > > > +compiling in the .debug or .decldebug grades or with the @samp{--trace deep}
> > >
> > > The .decldebug grade is not currently documented.
> > >
> >
> > Okay, I commented out the .decldebug bit.
> >
> Might it not be better to just document the .decldebug grades since they
> are now useful for the subterm dependency tracking anyway? Perhaps,
> as a separate change though.
>
Yes that's a seperate change. I noticed that the .decldebug grade
documentation is commented out in several places, so I need to go
through and uncomment it.
Ian.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
mercury-reviews mailing list
post: mercury-reviews at cs.mu.oz.au
administrative address: owner-mercury-reviews at cs.mu.oz.au
unsubscribe: Address: mercury-reviews-request at cs.mu.oz.au Message: unsubscribe
subscribe: Address: mercury-reviews-request at cs.mu.oz.au Message: subscribe
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the reviews
mailing list