[m-rev.] diff: common.m improvement
Zoltan Somogyi
zs at cs.mu.OZ.AU
Thu Apr 21 09:56:31 AEST 2005
On 20-Apr-2005, Fergus Henderson <fjh at cs.mu.OZ.AU> wrote:
> I think it might be better to have something like this:
>
> common__types_match_exactly(Type1, Type2) :-
> (
> Type1 = Type2
> ;
> % check if the types are the same when you
> % ignore the term.context fields
>
> % XXX should succeed for embedded constraints
> type_to_ctor_and_args(Type1, TypeCtor1, Args1),
> type_to_ctor_and_args(Type2, TypeCtor2, Args2),
> TypeCtor1 = TypeCtor2,
> common__types_match_exactly_list(Args1, Args2)
> ).
That's what I had originally, but then I had a bootcheck succeed after
I modified common.m to abort if the first test failed the second succeeded.
In other words, the second disjunct isn't adding anything; that's why
I deleted it.
Zoltan.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
mercury-reviews mailing list
post: mercury-reviews at cs.mu.oz.au
administrative address: owner-mercury-reviews at cs.mu.oz.au
unsubscribe: Address: mercury-reviews-request at cs.mu.oz.au Message: unsubscribe
subscribe: Address: mercury-reviews-request at cs.mu.oz.au Message: subscribe
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the reviews
mailing list