[m-rev.] for review: where safe_equality is ...

[Zoltan Somogyi]

On 13-May-2003, Fergus Henderson <fjh at cs.mu.OZ.AU> wrote:
> That sounds like a bug.  It shouldn't report an error for that.
> The (in, in) mode of unification has determinism `semidet',
> not `cc_multi', and so it should be fine to call it from a non-cc context.

The code in det_analysis.m, predicate det_check_for_noncanonical_type,
was mostly last modified by fjh, 22 Aug 97; an update by Simon on 3 Oct 99
looks to be just code factoring.

I think further discussion on this issue is best done in person.

Zoltan.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
mercury-reviews mailing list
post:  mercury-reviews at cs.mu.oz.au
administrative address: owner-mercury-reviews at cs.mu.oz.au
unsubscribe: Address: mercury-reviews-request at cs.mu.oz.au Message: unsubscribe
subscribe:   Address: mercury-reviews-request at cs.mu.oz.au Message: subscribe
--------------------------------------------------------------------------