[m-rev.] for review: Java implementation of time library now tested and correct
James Goddard
goddardjames at yahoo.com
Tue Dec 16 16:38:08 AEDT 2003
> So yes, please keep the milliseconds, and change the
> test case.
>
Will do.
> What happened to the code using DST_OFFSET?
>
It turns out that the DST_OFFSET value changes
depending on whether the current time the Calendar is
set to is daylight savings or not.
For Melbourne, get(DST_OFFSET) returns 3600000 during
daylight savings and 0 at other times.
So, if the value was supposed to be DST but isn't,
then subtracting get(DST_OFFSET) will have no effect
whatsoever. That's why I hard-coded 3600000
milliseconds.
Having said that, I didn't realize different timezones
had different DST offsets. I'll change it to use
SimpleTimeZone.getDSTSavings(), which stays constant.
http://personals.yahoo.com.au - Yahoo! Personals
New people, new possibilities. FREE for a limited time.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
mercury-reviews mailing list
post: mercury-reviews at cs.mu.oz.au
administrative address: owner-mercury-reviews at cs.mu.oz.au
unsubscribe: Address: mercury-reviews-request at cs.mu.oz.au Message: unsubscribe
subscribe: Address: mercury-reviews-request at cs.mu.oz.au Message: subscribe
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the reviews
mailing list