[m-rev.] for review: stack -lN and nondet_stack -lN

[Fergus Henderson]

On 16-Apr-2003, David Overton <dmo at cs.mu.OZ.AU> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2003 at 12:47:17PM +1000, Zoltan Somogyi wrote:
> > > Without thinking too much, my inclination is to drop the `-l' and just
> > > take an optional numerical argument like step etc. and like gdb's stack
> > > (backtrace/where/info stack) command.  This makes things easier for
> > > people moving between gdb and mdb.
> > 
> > Any others in favor of this change?
> 
> Yes, I agree with Peter.

Me too.

-- 
Fergus Henderson <fjh at cs.mu.oz.au>  |  "I have always known that the pursuit
The University of Melbourne         |  of excellence is a lethal habit"
WWW: <http://www.cs.mu.oz.au/~fjh>  |     -- the last words of T. S. Garp.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
mercury-reviews mailing list
post:  mercury-reviews at cs.mu.oz.au
administrative address: owner-mercury-reviews at cs.mu.oz.au
unsubscribe: Address: mercury-reviews-request at cs.mu.oz.au Message: unsubscribe
subscribe:   Address: mercury-reviews-request at cs.mu.oz.au Message: subscribe
--------------------------------------------------------------------------