[m-rev.] for review: list__sort_and_remove_equivs/3

[Ralph Becket]

Mark Brown, Friday,  6 September 2002:
> 
> As I mentioned earlier, we apparently assume that Compare(X, Y, (=))
> implies X = Y, so the above inconsistency is not an issue.  I'm prepared
> to make the changes required, but I need some feedback on the following:
> do we wish to keep this assumption or throw it out (I vote for the latter)?

Chuck it (only its converse should be valid.)

- Ralph
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
mercury-reviews mailing list
post:  mercury-reviews at cs.mu.oz.au
administrative address: owner-mercury-reviews at cs.mu.oz.au
unsubscribe: Address: mercury-reviews-request at cs.mu.oz.au Message: unsubscribe
subscribe:   Address: mercury-reviews-request at cs.mu.oz.au Message: subscribe
--------------------------------------------------------------------------