[m-rev.] For review by Fergus: Loop Invariant Hoisting
Zoltan Somogyi
zs at cs.mu.OZ.AU
Thu Oct 31 12:19:28 AEDT 2002
On 30-Oct-2002, Fergus Henderson <fjh at cs.mu.OZ.AU> wrote:
> Probably the increase in code size is more costly (in terms of cache
> performance) for asm_fast.gc, which already has a high code size.
I agree.
> What's the uncertainty/variance in these numbers?
I doubt that any of the differences are significant, except in hlc.gc at -O3
and *maybe* in asm_fast.gc at -O6.
> Did you run the benchmarks at the same time that the nightly tests
> were running?
I looked at the raw numbers, and the CPU utilization was consistently
above 99%, so the answer is no.
> I think it should be disabled if --optimize-space is specified.
Agreed.
Zoltan.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
mercury-reviews mailing list
post: mercury-reviews at cs.mu.oz.au
administrative address: owner-mercury-reviews at cs.mu.oz.au
unsubscribe: Address: mercury-reviews-request at cs.mu.oz.au Message: unsubscribe
subscribe: Address: mercury-reviews-request at cs.mu.oz.au Message: subscribe
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the reviews
mailing list