[m-rev.] for review: enable `il' grade
Fergus Henderson
fjh at cs.mu.OZ.AU
Wed Oct 23 15:39:32 AEST 2002
On 22-Oct-2002, Peter Ross <pro at missioncriticalit.com> wrote:
> > Peter Ross, any comments on this one?
>
> I have looked into this further.
>
> I would hold off on this for awhile.
I had already committed it after seeing your previous mail.
It would be possible to revert it, of course, but I don't think that is
worthwhile. Better to just fix the bugs in the il grade.
> The best test case that I have for
> this one is a test application we are developing that is a workflow
> engine. It currently runs in the ilc grade. I have yet been able to
> test it on the il grade (I had only just succeeded in compiling the
> library in the il grade when I went on holidays). When I can build this
> application then I think that would be the time to switch to making il
> the default. Hopefully that is soon.
By all means go ahead and test your application
However, since the sources for this test are not publically available,
I don't think that is a good criteria for deciding when we should make
il grade the default.
--
Fergus Henderson <fjh at cs.mu.oz.au> | "I have always known that the pursuit
The University of Melbourne | of excellence is a lethal habit"
WWW: <http://www.cs.mu.oz.au/~fjh> | -- the last words of T. S. Garp.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
mercury-reviews mailing list
post: mercury-reviews at cs.mu.oz.au
administrative address: owner-mercury-reviews at cs.mu.oz.au
unsubscribe: Address: mercury-reviews-request at cs.mu.oz.au Message: unsubscribe
subscribe: Address: mercury-reviews-request at cs.mu.oz.au Message: subscribe
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the reviews
mailing list