[m-rev.] for review: enable `il' grade
Peter Ross
pro at missioncriticalit.com
Mon Oct 21 06:19:41 AEST 2002
On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 12:30:01AM +1000, Fergus Henderson wrote:
> Peter Ross, any comments on this one?
> I haven't run the tests for the `ilc' grade recently,
> so I don't know how the test result for that grade compare,
> but the `il' grade is the one we want to use going forward,
> and I think the `il' grade is currently passing enough tests
> that we should enable it by default.
>
I just got back from holidays, so it is going to take quite awhile for
me to get through all my mail, but I saw this one and got quite excited
assuming that we must be a lot further along for the il grade.
The ilc grade isn't nice, it is hard to write foreign_proc code for and
it makes it hard to use Mercury code from other languages so if il is
passing all the tests then bravo and make it the default grade. I am
more than happy never to see the ilc grade ever again.
Pete
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
mercury-reviews mailing list
post: mercury-reviews at cs.mu.oz.au
administrative address: owner-mercury-reviews at cs.mu.oz.au
unsubscribe: Address: mercury-reviews-request at cs.mu.oz.au Message: unsubscribe
subscribe: Address: mercury-reviews-request at cs.mu.oz.au Message: subscribe
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the reviews
mailing list