[m-rev.] for review: update NEWS and HISTORY files

[Michael Day]

> Of course it isn't terribly important, but consistency is worth
> something and I can't think of any reason why the Mercury distribution
> should deviate from this suggestion.  (The name ONEWS makes it clearer
> what sort of information it contains, typically more useful than HISTORY
> files.)  So enough benefit to justify doing:

Consistency? I've never seen an ONEWS file in my life. And HISTORY is 
obvious, ONEWS looks like "one whitespace" to me.

(Naming and syntax, the only things worth arguing about... :)

Michael

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
mercury-reviews mailing list
post:  mercury-reviews at cs.mu.oz.au
administrative address: owner-mercury-reviews at cs.mu.oz.au
unsubscribe: Address: mercury-reviews-request at cs.mu.oz.au Message: unsubscribe
subscribe:   Address: mercury-reviews-request at cs.mu.oz.au Message: subscribe
--------------------------------------------------------------------------