[m-rev.] for review: determine more minimal dependency relations

[Fergus Henderson]

On 15-Feb-2002, Michael Day <mikeday at bigpond.net.au> wrote:
> 
> > Well, for now I was planning to leave the file names unchanged,
> > to preserve the CVS history and to avoid getting CVS conflicts
> > with everyone else's outstanding changes.  Only the module names
> > would change.
> 
> Oh. Doesn't that (file name != module name) give an error? Or at least a
> warning? (just as bad, with --halt-at-warn...)

No.  You only get a warning if the file name doesn't match some
suffix of the fully qualified module name.

E.g. for a module named `foo__bar__baz', you can call the source
file `foo.bar.baz.m', `bar.baz.m', or `baz.m'.

-- 
Fergus Henderson <fjh at cs.mu.oz.au>  |  "I have always known that the pursuit
The University of Melbourne         |  of excellence is a lethal habit"
WWW: <http://www.cs.mu.oz.au/~fjh>  |     -- the last words of T. S. Garp.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
mercury-reviews mailing list
post:  mercury-reviews at cs.mu.oz.au
administrative address: owner-mercury-reviews at cs.mu.oz.au
unsubscribe: Address: mercury-reviews-request at cs.mu.oz.au Message: unsubscribe
subscribe:   Address: mercury-reviews-request at cs.mu.oz.au Message: subscribe
--------------------------------------------------------------------------