[m-rev.] Extend recognition of field access syntax
Peter Moulder
pmoulder at csse.monash.edu.au
Wed Dec 18 14:20:46 AEDT 2002
On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 12:30:40PM +1100, Ralph Becket wrote:
> @example
> -:- func increment_field3(type1) = type1.
> +:- func type1 ~ increment_field3 = type1.
^^^
Presumably a typo. (`~' doesn't occur elsewhere in the patch, and isn't
mentioned in reference_manual.texi other than as a unary operator.)
> +++ hard_coded/field_syntax.m
> ...
> io.format(...)
I'm guessing this is fine, but just in case, I'll mention that nothing
in the head brach that I can see uses `.' syntax yet, and using `.'
hinders bootstrapping. Just thought I'd mention it.
pjm.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
mercury-reviews mailing list
post: mercury-reviews at cs.mu.oz.au
administrative address: owner-mercury-reviews at cs.mu.oz.au
unsubscribe: Address: mercury-reviews-request at cs.mu.oz.au Message: unsubscribe
subscribe: Address: mercury-reviews-request at cs.mu.oz.au Message: subscribe
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the reviews
mailing list