[m-rev.] for review: comparison of preds/funcs
Mark Brown
dougl at cs.mu.OZ.AU
Thu Apr 18 16:56:18 AEST 2002
On 17-Apr-2002, Zoltan Somogyi <zs at cs.mu.OZ.AU> wrote:
> On 16-Apr-2002, Fergus Henderson <fjh at cs.mu.OZ.AU> wrote:
> > You should not add something and document it as working
> > but then not implement it for the MLDS back-end.
> >
> > This should either (1) be implemented for the MLDS back-end too,
> > or (2) should be treated as work-in-progress,
> > not as something which is officially documented and supported.
> >
> > I advise (1).
>
> While (1) is a good idea in theory, it is a very bad idea right now, because
> I have a change in progress that will cause an unholy mess of conflicts if
> (1) goes ahead.
>
> (2) should be sufficient for Mark's current needs.
Ok. For the moment, I will not commit the NEWS entry and I'll move the
declarations of compare_representation into the non-documented part of
std_util's interface, along with an XXX. I'll post the relative diff
after the rest of the change is reviewed.
Cheers,
Mark.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
mercury-reviews mailing list
post: mercury-reviews at cs.mu.oz.au
administrative address: owner-mercury-reviews at cs.mu.oz.au
unsubscribe: Address: mercury-reviews-request at cs.mu.oz.au Message: unsubscribe
subscribe: Address: mercury-reviews-request at cs.mu.oz.au Message: subscribe
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the reviews
mailing list